On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:48:30PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 08:15:42PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
wrote:
On
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:48:30PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 08:15:42PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sat,
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 12:16:20PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:48:30PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
wrote:
On
Paul Bolle schreef op wo 02-07-2014 om 10:53 [+0200]:
On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 12:17 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
This does not ring any bells to me (but that doesn't prove anything). A
bisect result would be awesome.
The bisect (which took me quite some time) points at commit 98ec77397a5c
On 15 May 2014 18:58, Jani Nikula jani.nik...@intel.com wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2014, Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@gmail.com wrote:
We do have to continue the investigation on the link training side, but
since 76711 is a critical I'm completely in favor of this workaround for
now.
I just tested
On 14 July 2014 10:46, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 May 2014 18:58, Jani Nikula jani.nik...@intel.com wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2014, Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@gmail.com wrote:
We do have to continue the investigation on the link training side, but
since 76711 is a critical I'm
From: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
This reverts commit 38aecea0ccbb909d635619cba22f1891e589b434.
This breaks Haswell Thinkpad + Lenovo dock in SST mode with a HDMI monitor
attached.
Before this we can 1920x1200 mode, after this we only ever get 1024x768, and
a lot of deferring.
This didn't
On 7/12/2014 3:29 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 10:31:59AM +0530, sonika.jin...@intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
Sprite planes support 180 degree rotation. The lower layers are now in
place, so hook in the standard rotation property to
1) The design is by no means to disable boost and idle strategy. They are every
effective dealing with burst request, bring up the responsiveness.
2) The patch did disable part of gen6_set_rps_thresholds(), but gen6_set_rps
is supposed to function the same as before.
Would you point out the