Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

On 2 January 2016 at 23:56, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Hi Dave, Linus - Hi Linus, can you pull this directly, baby has arrived, but I'm not back at work yet. Dave. > > Two display fixes still for v4.4. > > The new year's resolution is to start using signed tags per Linus' >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: increase the tries for HDMI hotplug live status checking

So sorry for it, and will keep in mind on this kind of mistake. Gary -Original Message- From: Kumar, Shobhit [mailto:shobhit.ku...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 1:47 AM To: Jani Nikula ; Wang, Gary C ;

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

On Jan 3, 2016 18:06, "Dave Airlie" wrote: > > can you pull this directly, baby has arrived, but I'm not back at work yet. Assumed so, and already did. It's in rc8, Linus ___ Intel-gfx mailing list

[Intel-gfx] ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT

== Summary == Built on 79686f613b3955a4ed09cee936e7f70ec4e61b67 drm-intel-nightly: 2015y-12m-30d-11h-59m-54s UTC integration manifest Test gem_storedw_loop: Subgroup basic-render: dmesg-warn -> PASS (skl-i7k-2) Test kms_flip: Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:

Re: [Intel-gfx] Suspend To RAM failure in >= 4.1 - bissected to "drm/i915: Track GEN6 page table usage"

Hi, > I then ran a git bissect between v4.0 and v4.1 from Linus's tree and > found the "guilty" commit was > > commit 317b4e903636305cfe702ab3e5b3d68547a69e72 > Author: Ben Widawsky > Date: Mon Mar 16 16:00:55 2015 + > > drm/i915: Extract context switch

[Intel-gfx] Suspend To RAM failure in >= 4.1 - bissected to "drm/i915: Track GEN6 page table usage"

Hi, When trying to upgrade my kernel yesterday to the latest 4.3.3 I noticed that the suspend to ram was not working. Basically it goes to sleep but never wakes up. It seems to power up but no screen, not available through ssh either and afaict nothing runs afterwards. I first tried a couple

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] i915: correctly handling failed allocation

On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 4:16 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 29 Dec 2015, Insu Yun wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Insu Yun > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [4.1.7-rt8][report] Very high cyclictest latency during glmark2 on i915 gpu

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > I have to admit, the i915 tries very hard to avoid running on -RT. Could > you try the s/local_irq_disable();/local_irq_disable_nort();/ patch > mentioned in the thread? It did not crash so far, I did some

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] i915: correctly handling failed allocation

Signed-off-by: Insu Yun --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c index a5e99ac..4e279dd 100644 ---

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] i915: correctly handling failed allocation

Since devm_kzalloc can be failed, it needs to be checked if not, NULL dereference could be happened. Signed-off-by: Insu Yun --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/docs: more leftovers from the big vtable documentation pile

Another pile of vfuncs from the old gpu.tmpl xml documentation that I've forgotten to delete. I spotted a few more things to clarify/extend in the new kerneldoc while going through this once more. v2: Spelling fixes (Thierry). Cc: Laurent Pinchart Cc: Thierry

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: Save/Restore Backlight registers when PG0 is gated

On Sat, 02 Jan 2016, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 31 Dec 2015, Vidya Srinivas wrote: >> Currently Backlight registers which are associated with Power Well 0 >> are not being saved before gating the power well for S0ix. Hence, >> upon resume

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/docs: more leftovers from the big vtable documentation pile

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 11:22:52AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 06:18:25PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Another pile of vfuncs from the old gpu.tmpl xml documentation that > > I've forgotten to delete. I spotted a few more things to > > clarify/extend in the new

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/dp/mst: constify drm_dp_mst_topology_cbs structures

On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:20:30PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > The drm_dp_mst_topology_cbs structures are never modified, so declare them > as const. > > Done with the help of Coccinelle. > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall Applied to drm-misc, thanks. -Daniel > > --- >

[Intel-gfx] Intel graphics on Thinkpad T540p is most unsuable now :( (Intel(R) HD Graphics 4600)

On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 08:52:17AM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote: > > Thanks both. I filed a bug as requested: > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93438 > > > > It just crashed again, same crash. Looks like I'm going to get a crash every > > 2 days or so at this stage. > > Sigh, same

Re: [Intel-gfx] i965 LVDS mode setting questions

December 29 2015 6:37 PM, "Alexander von Gluck IV" wrote: > I'm working on getting our intel driver cleaned up under Haiku. > > i965 was working, however I have run into a few strange issues > with the LVDS control changing on it's own after setting after > my rewrite.