== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: split out i915_reg_read_ioctl() to i915_ioctl.[ch]
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/99096/
State : warning
== Summary ==
$ dim sparse --fast origin/drm-tip
Sparse version: v0.6.2
Fast mode used, each commit won't be checked separately.
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: split out i915_reg_read_ioctl() to i915_ioctl.[ch]
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/99096/
State : warning
== Summary ==
$ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip
74252406bb4c drm/i915: split out i915_reg_read_ioctl() to i915_ioctl.[ch]
-:57: WARNING:
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Sanitycheck PCI BARs on probe
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/99094/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_1 -> Patchwork_22038
Summary
---
**FAILURE*
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/locking: fix drm_modeset_acquire_ctx kernel-doc
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/99090/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_1_full -> Patchwork_22035_full
Summary
On 20/01/2022 11:33, Jani Nikula wrote:
Add new files i915_ioctl.[ch] to hold small ioctls that are out of place
everywhere else, and not big enough to warrant a file of their own. For
starters, it's just for i915_reg_read_ioctl() that's a bit high level
for a low level implementation that int
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [RESEND,1/7] drm/i915/mst: fix
intel_dp_mst_hpd_irq() indentation (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98788/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_1 -> Patchwork_22037
On 2022-01-18 at 17:50:37 +, Robert Beckett wrote:
> From: Matthew Auld
>
> On discrete platforms like DG2, we need to support a minimum page size
> of 64K when dealing with device local-memory. This is quite tricky for
> various reasons, so try to document the new implicit uapi for this.
>
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 10:49 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
>>
>> The stack_depot member was added without kernel-doc, leading to below
>> warning. Fix it.
>>
>> ./include/drm/drm_modeset_lock.h:74: warning: Function parameter or
>> member 'stack_depot' not des
On 2022-01-18 at 17:50:34 +, Robert Beckett wrote:
> From: Matthew Auld
>
> For local-memory objects we need to align the GTT addresses
> to 64K, both for the ppgtt and ggtt.
>
> We need to support vm->min_alignment > 4K, depending
> on the vm itself and the type of object we are inserting.
Hi Jani,
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 11:48:56 +0200 Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> The stack_depot member was added without kernel-doc, leading to below
> warning. Fix it.
>
> ./include/drm/drm_modeset_lock.h:74: warning: Function parameter or
> member 'stack_depot' not described in 'drm_modeset_acquire_ctx'
>
Add new files i915_ioctl.[ch] to hold small ioctls that are out of place
everywhere else, and not big enough to warrant a file of their own. For
starters, it's just for i915_reg_read_ioctl() that's a bit high level
for a low level implementation that intel_uncore.[ch] is.
Suggested-by: Tvrtko Ursu
> -Original Message-
> From: Nikula, Jani
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:32 PM
> To: Shankar, Uma ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RESEND 7/7] drm/i915/mst: only ack the ESI we
> actually handled
>
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022, "Shankar, Uma" wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Jani
> Nikula
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:31 PM
> To: Nikula, Jani ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/mst: only ack the ESI we actually
> handled
>
> Seems odd that we clear all eve
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 10:49 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> The stack_depot member was added without kernel-doc, leading to below
> warning. Fix it.
>
> ./include/drm/drm_modeset_lock.h:74: warning: Function parameter or
> member 'stack_depot' not described in 'drm_modeset_acquire_ctx'
>
> Reported-by
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Jani
> Nikula
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 4:33 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Nikula, Jani
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RESEND 2/7] drm/i915/mst: abstract
> intel_dp_ack_sink_irq_esi()
>
> Smaller functions
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Jani
> Nikula
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 4:33 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Nikula, Jani
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RESEND 1/7] drm/i915/mst: fix
> intel_dp_mst_hpd_irq()
> indentation
>
> Remove extra
From: Piotr Piórkowski
For proper operation of i915 we need usable PCI BARs:
- GTTMMADDR BAR 0 (1 for GEN2)
- GFXMEM BAR 2.
Lets check before we start the i915 probe that these BARs are set,
and that they have a size greater than 0.
Signed-off-by: Piotr Piórkowski
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko
Cc: Ja
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/mst: DP MST ESI handling improvements (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98479/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_1 -> Patchwork_22036
Summary
---
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022, "Shankar, Uma" wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Jani
>> Nikula
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 4:33 PM
>> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: Nikula, Jani
>> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RESEND 7/7] drm/i915/mst: only ack the E
Seems odd that we clear all event status indicators if we've only
handled some. Only clear the ones we've handled.
v2: ack DOWN_REP and UP_REQ only if they were set in esi (Ville)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 20
1 file changed, 1
Hi Matt,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on drm-tip/drm-tip]
[cannot apply to drm-intel/for-linux-next v5.16 next-20220120]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--bas
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Jani
> Nikula
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 4:33 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Nikula, Jani
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RESEND 7/7] drm/i915/mst: only ack the ESI we
> actually
> handled
>
> Seems odd that
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/locking: fix drm_modeset_acquire_ctx kernel-doc
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/99090/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_1 -> Patchwork_22035
Summary
---
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Jani
> Nikula
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 4:33 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Nikula, Jani
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RESEND 6/7] drm/i915/mst: ack sink irq ESI for
> link status
> changes
>
> Only specif
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Jani
> Nikula
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 4:33 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Nikula, Jani
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RESEND 5/7] drm/i915/mst: read link status only
> when
> requested by sink in ESI
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Jani
> Nikula
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 4:33 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Nikula, Jani
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RESEND 4/7] drm/i915/mst: abstract handling of
> link
> status in DP MST
>
> We'll wan
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Jani
> Nikula
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 4:33 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Nikula, Jani
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RESEND 3/7] drm/i915/mst: debug log 4 bytes of
> ESI right
> after reading
>
> For wha
On 19/01/2022 11:12, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2022, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 05/01/2022 13:18, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2022, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 05/01/2022 10:32, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2022, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 05/01/2022 10:05, Jani Nikula wrote
> -Original Message-
> From: Nikula, Jani
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:02 PM
> To: Shankar, Uma ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/mst: abstract
> intel_dp_ack_sink_irq_esi()
>
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022, "Shankar, Uma" wrote:
> >>
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022, "Shankar, Uma" wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Jani
>> Nikula
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 11:10 PM
>> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: Nikula, Jani
>> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/mst: abstract
>> intel_dp_a
Seems odd that we clear all event status indicators if we've only
handled some. Only clear the ones we've handled.
v2: ack DOWN_REP and UP_REQ only if they were set in esi (Ville)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 20
1 file changed, 1
On 19/01/2022 15:08, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 04:55:35PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Proposal to standardise the fdinfo text format as optionally output by DRM
drivers.
Idea is that a simple but, well defined, spec will enable generic
userspace tool
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Jani
> Nikula
> Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 11:10 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Nikula, Jani
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/mst: abstract
> intel_dp_ack_sink_irq_esi()
>
> Smaller functions make the
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Jani
> Nikula
> Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 11:10 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Nikula, Jani
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/mst: fix intel_dp_mst_hpd_irq()
> indentation
>
> Remove extra indentation.
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 05:53:57PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
>> From: Ville Syrjälä
>>
>> Quick attempt at unifying the VBT DDI parsing to all g4x+
>> platforms.
>>
>> Note that we'll still use the hardware straps as the primary
>> source of port p
Hi Dave and Daniel,
A couple display fixes for the merge window. One for EHL and one for ADL-P,
and both in the are of voltage swing programming.
Regards,
Tvrtko
---
drm-intel-next-fixes-2022-01-20:
- Latest updates for the EHL display voltage swing table (José Roberto de Souza)
- Additional
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/locking: fix drm_modeset_acquire_ctx kernel-doc
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/99090/
State : warning
== Summary ==
$ dim sparse --fast origin/drm-tip
Sparse version: v0.6.2
Fast mode used, each commit won't be checked separately.
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022, Matt Roper wrote:
> Several of our i915 header files, have been including i915_reg.h. This
> means that any change to i915_reg.h will trigger a full rebuild of
> pretty much every file of the driver, even those that don't have any
> kind of register access. Let's delete the
On 19/01/2022 17:47, Thomas Hellström wrote:
In some cases we use leftover kfree() instead of i915_vma_resource_free().
Fix this.
Fixes: Fixes: 2f6b90da9192 ("drm/i915: Use vma resources for async unbinding")
Reported-by: Robert Beckett
Cc: Matthew Auld
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström
Review
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022, Matt Roper wrote:
> Let's use 'struct i915_range' to express sets of b-counter and mux
> registers in the perf code. This makes the code more similar to how we
> handle things like multicast register ranges, forcewake tables, shadow
> tables, etc. and also lets us avoid needi
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 21:01:04 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
>> produced this warning:
>>
>> include/drm/drm_modeset_lock.h:74: warning: Function parameter or me
The stack_depot member was added without kernel-doc, leading to below
warning. Fix it.
./include/drm/drm_modeset_lock.h:74: warning: Function parameter or
member 'stack_depot' not described in 'drm_modeset_acquire_ctx'
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell
Fixes: cd06ab2fd48f ("drm/locking: add backtrac
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed 2022-01-19 16:16:12, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022, Petr Mladek wrote:
>> > On Tue 2022-01-18 23:24:47, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> >> d. This doesn't bring onoff() helper as there are some places in the
>> >>kernel with onoff as vari
...
> Yeah, and I am sorry for bikeshedding. Honestly, I do not know what is
> better. This is why I do not want to block this series when others
> like this.
>
> My main motivation is to point out that:
>
> enabledisable(enable)
>
> might be, for some people, more eye bleeding than
>
>
== Series Details ==
Series: Second round of i915_reg.h splitting
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/99079/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_1_full -> Patchwork_22034_full
Summary
---
**F
101 - 145 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
