Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 4/6] drm/i915/panelreplay: Initializaton and compute config for panel replay

2023-08-25 Thread kernel test robot
Hi Animesh, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on drm-tip/drm-tip] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Animesh-Manna/drm-panelreplay-dpcd-register-definition-for-panelreplay/20230824-14 base:

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/tc: some clean-ups in max lane count handling code (rev4)

2023-08-25 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/tc: some clean-ups in max lane count handling code (rev4) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/120980/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13566_full -> Patchwork_120980v4_full

Re: [Intel-gfx] [topic/core-for-ci v2] iommu/vt-d: Check domain flags before setting snp bit in page-control

2023-08-25 Thread Sripada, Radhakrishna
> -Original Message- > From: Rodrigo Vivi > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2023 10:24 AM > To: Sripada, Radhakrishna > Cc: Jani Nikula ; > intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; > Raj, Ashok > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [topic/core-for-ci v2] iommu/vt-d: Check domain flags > before setting snp

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/gt: Remove interruptible flag from wait_for_space

2023-08-25 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/gt: Remove interruptible flag from wait_for_space URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/122936/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13568 -> Patchwork_122936v1

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/gt: Remove interruptible flag from wait_for_space

2023-08-25 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/gt: Remove interruptible flag from wait_for_space URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/122936/ State : warning == Summary == Error: dim sparse failed /home/kbuild2/linux/maintainer-tools/dim: line 50: /home/kbuild2/.dimrc: No such file or

Re: [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] [PATCH 31/42] drm/i915/lnl: Add gmbus/ddc support

2023-08-25 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 02:55:33PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 09:25:54PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 01:49:21PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 10:07:29AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > LNL's south display uses the same table

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/1] drm/i915/gt: Remove interruptible flag from wait_for_space

2023-08-25 Thread Jonathan Cavitt
When performing the i915_request_wait in wait_for_space, which itself is called by intel_ring_begin, we do not need to apply the I915_TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE flag. So, remove it. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cavitt CC: Chris Wilson CC: Andi Shyti Jonathan Cavitt (1): drm/i915/gt: Remove

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/gt: Remove interruptible flag from wait_for_space

2023-08-25 Thread Jonathan Cavitt
When performing the i915_request_wait in wait_for_space, which itself is called by intel_ring_begin, we do not need to apply the I915_TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE flag. So, remove it. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cavitt --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3

Re: [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] [PATCH 31/42] drm/i915/lnl: Add gmbus/ddc support

2023-08-25 Thread Matt Roper
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 09:25:54PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 01:49:21PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 10:07:29AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > > LNL's south display uses the same table as MTP. Check for LNL's fake PCH > > > to make it

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/42] drm/i915/xe2lpd: Add DC state support

2023-08-25 Thread Srivatsa, Anusha
> -Original Message- > From: De Marchi, Lucas > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2023 10:07 AM > To: intel...@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Roper, Matthew D ; Srivatsa, Anusha > ; De Marchi, Lucas > Subject: [PATCH 22/42] drm/i915/xe2lpd: Add DC state support

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/42] drm/i915/xe2lpd: Don't try to program PLANE_AUX_DIST

2023-08-25 Thread Srivatsa, Anusha
> -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Lucas > De > Marchi > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2023 10:07 AM > To: intel...@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: De Marchi, Lucas ; Roper, Matthew D > > Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/42] drm/i915/xe2lpd:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915/guc: Close deregister-context race against CT-loss

2023-08-25 Thread Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
just a follow up note-to-self: On Tue, 2023-08-15 at 12:08 -0700, Teres Alexis, Alan Previn wrote: > On Tue, 2023-08-15 at 09:56 -0400, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 06:12:09PM -0700, Alan Previn wrote: > > > [snip] in guc_submission_send_busy_loop, we are incrementing the

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/gsc: define gsc fw (rev3)

2023-08-25 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/gsc: define gsc fw (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/119310/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13568 -> Patchwork_119310v3 Summary ---

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915/guc: Flush context destruction worker at suspend

2023-08-25 Thread Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
Thanks again Rodrigo for reviewing and apologies for my tardy replies. We are stil testing on shipping platforms and these latest patches seemed to have reduced the frequency and solved the "system hangs" while suspending but its still causing issues so we continue to debug. (issue is that its

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gsc: define gsc fw

2023-08-25 Thread Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
On 8/25/2023 10:20 AM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 09:27:53AM -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: Add FW definition and the matching override modparam. The GSC FW has both a release version, based on platform and a rolling counter, and a compatibility version, which is the

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/gsc: define gsc fw (rev3)

2023-08-25 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/gsc: define gsc fw (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/119310/ State : warning == Summary == Error: dim sparse failed Sparse version: v0.6.2

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/display: Allow VRR parameters mismatch in case of dual refresh rate fastset

2023-08-25 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/display: Allow VRR parameters mismatch in case of dual refresh rate fastset URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/122926/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13568 -> Patchwork_122926v1

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/display: Allow VRR parameters mismatch in case of dual refresh rate fastset

2023-08-25 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/display: Allow VRR parameters mismatch in case of dual refresh rate fastset URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/122926/ State : warning == Summary == Error: dim sparse failed /home/kbuild2/linux/maintainer-tools/dim:

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/display: Allow VRR parameters mismatch in case of dual refresh rate fastset

2023-08-25 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/display: Allow VRR parameters mismatch in case of dual refresh rate fastset URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/122926/ State : warning == Summary == Error: dim checkpatch failed 1dedbe087f62 drm/i915/display: Allow

Re: [Intel-gfx] [topic/core-for-ci v2] iommu/vt-d: Check domain flags before setting snp bit in page-control

2023-08-25 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 02:15:27PM +, Sripada, Radhakrishna wrote: > I was trying this as a solution for the Pipe fault errors. However, I still > see > The pipe fault errors which do not occur all the time. We should avoid overloading CI with tests. But if needed because we cannot reproduce

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gsc: define gsc fw

2023-08-25 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 09:27:53AM -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: > Add FW definition and the matching override modparam. > > The GSC FW has both a release version, based on platform and a rolling > counter, and a compatibility version, which is the one tracking > interface changes. Since

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/sdvo: DDC rework and fixes (rev2)

2023-08-25 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/sdvo: DDC rework and fixes (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/120253/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13568 -> Patchwork_120253v2 Summary ---

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 1/4] drm: Use XArray instead of IDR for minors

2023-08-25 Thread James Zhu
On 2023-07-24 17:14, Michał Winiarski wrote: IDR is deprecated, and since XArray manages its own state with internal locking, it simplifies the locking on DRM side. Additionally, don't use the IRQ-safe variant, since operating on drm minor is not done in IRQ context. Signed-off-by: Michał

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm, cec and edid updates (rev2)

2023-08-25 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm, cec and edid updates (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/122841/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13568 -> Patchwork_122841v2 Summary --- **SUCCESS**

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gsc: define gsc fw

2023-08-25 Thread Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
Add FW definition and the matching override modparam. The GSC FW has both a release version, based on platform and a rolling counter, and a compatibility version, which is the one tracking interface changes. Since what we care about is the interface, we use the compatibility version in the binary

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm, cec and edid updates (rev2)

2023-08-25 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm, cec and edid updates (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/122841/ State : warning == Summary == Error: dim sparse failed /home/kbuild2/linux/maintainer-tools/dim: line 50: /home/kbuild2/.dimrc: No such file or directory

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/display/vrr: Update VRR parameters in fastset

2023-08-25 Thread Manasi Navare
In Seamless refresh rate switching when we throttle refresh rate VRR parameters get updated. Update these in fastset in update_crtc() hook before enabling VRR so that the VRR range now reflects the throttled refresh rate correctly. This has been tested for Dual refresh rate + VRR use cases

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/display: Allow VRR parameters mismatch in case of dual refresh rate fastset

2023-08-25 Thread Manasi Navare
In case of a panel that supports DRRS and seamless_m_n, dual refresh rate allows to seamlessly switch to a downclock mode to save power. This is expected to happen seamlessly without a full modeset as in this case we allow the mismatch in mode's crtc clock. With VRR fastset patch series

Re: [Intel-gfx] [topic/core-for-ci v2] iommu/vt-d: Check domain flags before setting snp bit in page-control

2023-08-25 Thread Sripada, Radhakrishna
I was trying this as a solution for the Pipe fault errors. However, I still see The pipe fault errors which do not occur all the time. Will update the explanation in my follow up patches. Thanks, Radhakrishna Sripada > -Original Message- > From: Jani Nikula > Sent: Thursday, August 24,

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/i915/sdvo: Nuke the duplicate sdvo->port

2023-08-25 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä We already have encoder->port so get rid of the duplicate sdvo->port. Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c | 19 --- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/i915/sdvo: Initialize the encoder earlier

2023-08-25 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Call drm_encoder_init() earlier so that we don't have to keep passing the i915/dev_priv around separately. v2: Reorder drm_encoder_cleanup() in the error path (Jani) Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c | 37

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/i915/sdvo: Print out the i2c pin and slave address

2023-08-25 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä To reduce the guesswork a bit let's print out the SDVO device i2c bus and slave address during init. Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/i915/sdvo: Rework DDC bus handling

2023-08-25 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Each SDVO device can have up to three sets of DDC pins. Currently we just register a single i2c_adapter for the entire SDVO device and semi-randomly pick the "correct" set of DDC pins during intel_sdvo_tmds_sink_detect(). This doesn't make any real sense especially if we have

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/i915/sdvo: Get rid of the per-connector i2c symlink

2023-08-25 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä We should switch over to the standard "ddc" per-connector symlink instead of rolling our own thing. The i2c specific symlink is also in the way of reworking the SDVO DDC handling (which is a mess atm) so get rid of it. Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/i915/sdvo: Nuke attached_output tracking

2023-08-25 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Instead of operating on the output the user specified (via the connector) the current code tends to operate on whichever outputs it has detected as attached. That is not how the kms uapi is supposed to work. So simply get rid of attached_outputs and instead directly operate

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/6] drm/i915/sdvo: DDC rework and fixes

2023-08-25 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä I have plans to switch the whole driver over to using drm_connector_init_with_ddc(), and thus populate the sysfs "ddc" consistently. The biggest hurdle is the SDVO DDC handling, so start by cleaning that up. I also found some other issues with the SDVO code so some

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/cec: add drm_dp_cec_attach() as the non-edid version of set edid

2023-08-25 Thread Jani Nikula
Connectors have source physical address available in display info. There's no need to parse the EDID again for this. Add drm_dp_cec_attach() to do this. Seems like the set_edid/unset_edid naming is a bit specific now that there's no need to pass the EDID at all, so aim for attach/detach going

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for iommu/vt-d: Check domain flags before setting snp bit in page-control (rev2)

2023-08-25 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: iommu/vt-d: Check domain flags before setting snp bit in page-control (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/121893/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13562_full -> Patchwork_121893v2_full

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/tc: some clean-ups in max lane count handling code (rev4)

2023-08-25 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/tc: some clean-ups in max lane count handling code (rev4) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/120980/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13566 -> Patchwork_120980v4

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/tc: some clean-ups in max lane count handling code (rev4)

2023-08-25 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/tc: some clean-ups in max lane count handling code (rev4) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/120980/ State : warning == Summary == Error: dim sparse failed /home/kbuild2/linux/maintainer-tools/dim: line 50: /home/kbuild2/.dimrc: No such file

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/tc: some clean-ups in max lane count handling code (rev4)

2023-08-25 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/tc: some clean-ups in max lane count handling code (rev4) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/120980/ State : warning == Summary == Error: dim checkpatch failed /home/kbuild2/linux/maintainer-tools/dim: line 50: /home/kbuild2/.dimrc: No such

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/cec: add drm_dp_cec_attach() as the non-edid version of set edid

2023-08-25 Thread kernel test robot
Hi Jani, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on drm-intel/for-linux-next] [also build test ERROR on drm/drm-next next-20230825] [cannot apply to drm-intel/for-linux-next-fixes drm-misc/drm-misc-next linus/master v6.5-rc7] [If your patch is applied

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/cec: add drm_dp_cec_attach() as the non-edid version of set edid

2023-08-25 Thread kernel test robot
Hi Jani, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on drm-intel/for-linux-next] [also build test ERROR on drm/drm-next next-20230825] [cannot apply to drm-intel/for-linux-next-fixes drm-misc/drm-misc-next linus/master v6.5-rc7] [If your patch is applied

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm, cec and edid updates

2023-08-25 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm, cec and edid updates URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/122841/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13562_full -> Patchwork_122841v1_full Summary ---

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 4/6] drm/i915/panelreplay: Initializaton and compute config for panel replay

2023-08-25 Thread Manna, Animesh
> -Original Message- > From: Jani Nikula > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2023 5:05 PM > To: Manna, Animesh ; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 4/6] drm/i915/panelreplay: Initializaton > and > compute config for panel replay > > On Thu, 24 Aug 2023,

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/4] drm/i915/tc: rename mtl_tc_port_get_pin_assignment_mask()

2023-08-25 Thread Luca Coelho
This function doesn't really return the pin assignment mask, but the max lane count derived from that. So rename the function to mtl_tc_port_get_max_lane_count() to better reflect what it really does. Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho ---

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 4/4] drm/i915/tc: remove "fia" from intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count()

2023-08-25 Thread Luca Coelho
It is irrelevant for the caller that the max lane count is being derived from a FIA register, so having "fia" in the function name is irrelevant. Rename the function accordingly. Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho ---

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/i915/tc: move legacy code out of the main _max_lane_count() func

2023-08-25 Thread Luca Coelho
This makes the code a bit more symmetric and readable, especially when we start adding more display version-specific alternatives. Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 32 +++-- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+),

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 2/4] drm/i915/tc: make intel_tc_port_get_lane_mask() static

2023-08-25 Thread Luca Coelho
This function is only used locally, so make it static and remove the definition from the header file. Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h | 1 - 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/4] drm/i915/tc: some clean-ups in max lane count handling code

2023-08-25 Thread Luca Coelho
Hi, Here are four patches with some clean-ups in the code that handles the max lane count of Type-C connections. This is done mostly in preparation for a new way to read the pin assignments and lane count in future devices. In v2: * Fix some rebasing damage. In v3: * Fixed "assigment"

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/6] drm/panelreplay: dpcd register definition for panelreplay

2023-08-25 Thread Manna, Animesh
> -Original Message- > From: Jani Nikula > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2023 4:59 PM > To: Manna, Animesh ; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/6] drm/panelreplay: dpcd register > definition for panelreplay > > On Thu, 24 Aug 2023, Animesh Manna

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 6/6] drm/i915/panelreplay: enable/disable panel replay

2023-08-25 Thread Manna, Animesh
> -Original Message- > From: Hogander, Jouni > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2023 4:55 PM > To: Manna, Animesh ; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Murthy, Arun R > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] drm/i915/panelreplay: enable/disable panel > replay > > On Thu, 2023-08-24 at 09:39

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 2/6] drm/i915/panelreplay: Added HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() macro

2023-08-25 Thread Manna, Animesh
> -Original Message- > From: Hogander, Jouni > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2023 4:50 PM > To: Manna, Animesh ; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Murthy, Arun R > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] drm/i915/panelreplay: Added > HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() macro > > On Thu, 2023-08-24 at 09:39

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 41/42] drm/i915/xe2lpd: Update mbus on post plane updates

2023-08-25 Thread Kahola, Mika
> -Original Message- > From: De Marchi, Lucas > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2023 8:08 PM > To: intel...@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Lisovskiy, Stanislav ; Kahola, Mika > ; De Marchi, Lucas > > Subject: [PATCH 41/42] drm/i915/xe2lpd: Update mbus on post

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 37/42] drm/i915/xe2lpd: Write DBuf after CDCLK change in post plane

2023-08-25 Thread Kahola, Mika
> -Original Message- > From: De Marchi, Lucas > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2023 8:08 PM > To: intel...@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Lisovskiy, Stanislav ; Kahola, Mika > ; De Marchi, Lucas > > Subject: [PATCH 37/42] drm/i915/xe2lpd: Write DBuf after

Re: [Intel-gfx] [topic/core-for-ci v2] iommu/vt-d: Check domain flags before setting snp bit in page-control

2023-08-25 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 24 Aug 2023, Radhakrishna Sripada wrote: > From: Ashok Raj > The *why* goes here, along with a link to a gitlab issue. Please don't expect topic/core-for-ci to have lower standards than any other branches. That's not the case. On the contrary, you'll need the *additional*

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 0/2] SDP split for DP-MST

2023-08-25 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 22 Aug 2023, Vinod Govindapillai wrote: > SDP split config for DP-MST > > v1: Fix wrong port comparison (Jani Nikula) > > Vinod Govindapillai (2): > drm/i915/display: update intel_dp_has_audio to support MST > drm/i915/display: configure SDP split for DP-MST Pushed to din, thanks for

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/vma: constify unbind_fence_ops

2023-08-25 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 23 Aug 2023, "Hogander, Jouni" wrote: > On Fri, 2023-08-18 at 14:27 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> unbind_fence_ops can be const and placed in rodata. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula > > Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander Thanks, pushed to din. BR, Jani. > >> --- >>