> -Original Message-
> From: Luca Coelho
> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2024 5:57 PM
> To: Shankar, Uma ; Coelho, Luciano
> ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: intel...@lists.freedesktop.org; ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com; Nikula,
> Jani
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4]
[Public]
Ping for code review. Thanks!
Regards,
Wayne
From: Wayne Lin
Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2024 14:29
To: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; amd-...@lists.freedesktop.org;
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: ly...@redhat.com; Wentland, Harry;
On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 10:26:35AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 25/01/2024 à 01:04, Matthew Brost a écrit :
> > On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 04:15:34PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > > ida_alloc() and ida_free() should be preferred to the deprecated
> > > ida_simple_get() and
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 17:10:31 -0700, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
>
> When both hwmon and hwmon drvdata (on which hwmon depends) are device
> managed resources, the expectation, on device unbind, is that hwmon will be
> released before the drvdata. However, it appears devres does not do this
>
Le 25/01/2024 à 01:04, Matthew Brost a écrit :
On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 04:15:34PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
ida_alloc() and ida_free() should be preferred to the deprecated
ida_simple_get() and ida_simple_remove().
Note that the upper limit of ida_simple_get() is exclusive, but the one
