On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 02:36:30PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Oct 2019, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote:
[...]
> > I'm not sure what's wrong here. The patch applies cleanly to v5.4-rc1
> > and linux-next. Maybe patchwork is applying it to an older base?
>
> On the cont
vers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
I'm not sure what's wrong here. The patch applies cleanly to v5.4-rc1
and linux-next. Maybe patchwork is applying it to an older base?
Thanks,
Jonathan Neuschäfer
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Intel-gfx ma
/i915_drv.h:1199: warning: Incorrect use of kernel-doc
format: * Although we can always read back the head pointer
register,
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers
Sphinx complains that it can't find intel_guc_loader.c, and rightly so:
The file has been renamed.
Fixes: e8668bbcb0f9 ("drm/i915/guc: Rename intel_guc_loader.c to
intel_guc_fw.c")
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 09:51:13AM +0100, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:50:52 +0100, Jonathan Neuschäfer
> <j.neuschae...@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> > Sphinx complains that it can't find intel_guc_loader.c, and rightly so:
> > The file has been renamed.
&
