ted tool has rights to exist?
-Original Message-
From: Joonas Lahtinen [mailto:joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 5:52 PM
To: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Kukanova, Svetlana
; Chris Wilson ; Tvrtko
Ursulin ; Tvrtko Ursulin
Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx]
est observability features for tools?
Thank you,
Svetlana
-Original Message-
From: Joonas Lahtinen [mailto:joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2018 3:07 PM
To: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Kukanova, Svetlana
; Chris Wilson ; Tvrtko
Ursulin ; Tvrtko Ursulin
Subject
Joonas, sorry for interfering; could you please explain more regarding the
options for tracing scheduling events better than tracepoints?
After scheduling moves to GuC tools will have to switch to something like
GuC-logging; but while kmd does scheduling isn't kernel-tracing the best
solution?
I
Hi everyone,
Yes, this breaks userspace ABI and in particular it broke VTune work.
Ring ids are seen via i915 tracepoints, and VTune Amplifier uses them.
We were relying on the old ring ids, and assuming that the new rings would be
added to the end of the enum.
I'm objecting just now because no
