Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] igt_fb: Add Y-tiling support

2016-10-27 Thread Paneri, Praveen
- From: Tvrtko Ursulin [mailto:tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 1:36 PM To: Paneri, Praveen <praveen.pan...@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] igt_fb: Add Y-tiling support On 24/10/2016 17:55, Praveen Paneri wrote

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] igt_fb: Add Y-tiling support

2016-10-25 Thread Paneri, Praveen
rtko Ursulin [mailto:tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 6:07 PM To: Paneri, Praveen <praveen.pan...@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] igt_fb: Add Y-tiling support On 25/10/2016 13:06, Paneri, Praveen wrote: >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Keep track of active forcewake domains in a bitmask

2016-09-27 Thread Paneri, Praveen
. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> Cc: "Paneri, Praveen" <praveen.pan...@intel.com> Looks solid and should not run afoul of the games played during reset or suspend. Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> Thanks! Praveen,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/bxt: Broxton decoupled MMIO

2016-09-26 Thread Paneri, Praveen
On 9/23/2016 3:19 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: Hi, On 19/09/2016 18:15, Praveen Paneri wrote: Decoupled MMIO is an alternative way to access forcewake domain registers, which requires less cycles and avoids frequent software forcewake. I would like to see a sentence or two on how it works