Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/21] drm/armada: Introduce GEM object functions

2020-09-15 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux admin
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:59:39PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in > struct drm_driver. This patch replaces the per-driver callbacks with > per-instance callbacks in armada. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann Acked-by:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/5] uaccess: Rename user_access_begin/end() to user_full_access_begin/end()

2020-04-21 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux admin
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 03:49:19AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > The only source I'd been able to find speeks of >= 60 cycles > (and possibly much more) for non-pipelined coprocessor instructions; > the list of such does contain loads and stores to a bunch of registers. > However, the register in

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/51] drm/: Use drmm_add_final_kfree

2020-02-22 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux admin
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 10:02:46PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > These are the leftover drivers that didn't have a ->release hook that > needed to be updated. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > Cc: "James (Qian) Wang" > Cc: Liviu Dudau > Cc: Mihail Atanassov > Cc: Russell King > Cc: Hans de

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/15] drm/armada: Delete dma_buf->k(un)map implemenation

2019-11-25 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux admin
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 10:44:43PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:35:26AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > It's a dummy anyway. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > > Cc: Russell King > > I merged the entire series except this one and the final patch, sill > waiting

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dma-buf: add struct dma_buf_attach_info v2

2019-04-30 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux admin
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:10:02PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > Add a structure for the parameters of dma_buf_attach, this makes it much > easier > to add new parameters later on. I don't understand this reasoning. What are the "new parameters" that are being proposed, and why do we need to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] components: multiple components for a device

2019-02-08 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux admin
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 12:27:57AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Component framework is extended to support multiple components for > a struct device. These will be matched with different masters based on > its sub component value. > > We are introducing this, as I915 needs two different