Looks good to me. Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Yuan, Hang
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhenyu Wang [mailto:zhen...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2018 4:03 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: intel-gvt-...@lists.freedesktop.org; Yuan, Hang ;
&g
l_gvt_register_hypervisor(struct intel_gvt_mpt *m) {
> + int ret;
> + void *gvt;
> +
> + if (!intel_gvt_host.initialized)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + if (m->type != INTEL_GVT_HYPERVISOR_KVM &&
> + m->type != INT
Sorry I missed it. Thanks for the correction!
Regards,
Henry
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhenyu Wang [mailto:zhen...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 10:29 AM
> To: Chris Wilson
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Zhenyu Wang
> ; Yuan, H
> -Original Message-
> From: intel-gvt-dev [mailto:intel-gvt-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On
> Behalf Of Chris Wilson
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 8:51 PM
> To: Yuan, Hang
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com;
> matthew.w
Hi Chris,
I checked GVT shadow PPGTT handling codes and think GVT does propagate guest
PTE flags to shadow PPGTT entry. Then I run i915 self-test case
"igt_ctx_readonly" in KVMGT's guest. The case doesn't report any errors. Can I
know if there are any other reasons that you think GVT breaks
