Op 17-11-17 om 15:53 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 03:47:58PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Op 17-11-17 om 14:31 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
>>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 05:31:56PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
The watermarks it should calculate against are the old optimal
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 03:47:58PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 17-11-17 om 14:31 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 05:31:56PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> The watermarks it should calculate against are the old optimal watermarks.
> >> The currently active crtc
Op 17-11-17 om 14:31 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 05:31:56PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> The watermarks it should calculate against are the old optimal watermarks.
>> The currently active crtc watermarks are pure fiction, and are invalid in
>> case of a nonblocking
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 05:31:56PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> The watermarks it should calculate against are the old optimal watermarks.
> The currently active crtc watermarks are pure fiction, and are invalid in
> case of a nonblocking modeset, page flip enabling/disabling planes or any
>
The watermarks it should calculate against are the old optimal watermarks.
The currently active crtc watermarks are pure fiction, and are invalid in
case of a nonblocking modeset, page flip enabling/disabling planes or any
other reason.
When the crtc is disabled or during a modeset the
