Re: [Intel-gfx] [CI 01/12] drm/i915: Introduce intel_atomic_get_plane_state_after_check(), v2.

2019-10-30 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:17:52AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 29-10-2019 om 19:35 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 08:22:18AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> Use this in all the places where we try to acquire planes after the planes > >> atomic_check(). > >> > >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [CI 01/12] drm/i915: Introduce intel_atomic_get_plane_state_after_check(), v2.

2019-10-30 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 29-10-2019 om 19:35 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 08:22:18AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Use this in all the places where we try to acquire planes after the planes >> atomic_check(). >> >> In case of intel_modeset_all_pipes() this is not yet done after atomic_check, >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [CI 01/12] drm/i915: Introduce intel_atomic_get_plane_state_after_check(), v2.

2019-10-29 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 08:22:18AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Use this in all the places where we try to acquire planes after the planes > atomic_check(). > > In case of intel_modeset_all_pipes() this is not yet done after atomic_check, > but seems like it will be in the future. To add

[Intel-gfx] [CI 01/12] drm/i915: Introduce intel_atomic_get_plane_state_after_check(), v2.

2019-10-29 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Use this in all the places where we try to acquire planes after the planes atomic_check(). In case of intel_modeset_all_pipes() this is not yet done after atomic_check, but seems like it will be in the future. To add some paranoia, add all planes rather than active planes, because of bigjoiner