Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI / bus: Introduce a list of ids for "always present" devices

2017-04-10 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 10-04-17 15:56, Takashi Iwai wrote: On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 22:32:46 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 27-02-17 23:53, Takashi Iwai wrote: On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 22:27:58 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote: Oh, this is interesting, pl

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI / bus: Introduce a list of ids for "always present" devices

2017-04-10 Thread Takashi Iwai
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 22:32:46 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi, > > On 27-02-17 23:53, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 22:27:58 +0100, > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > >>> Oh, this is interesting, please let me jo

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI / bus: Introduce a list of ids for "always present" devices

2017-04-09 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 27-02-17 23:53, Takashi Iwai wrote: On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 22:27:58 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote: Oh, this is interesting, please let me join to the party. We've hit a similar problem, but for other one: namely, it's INT0002 tha

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI / bus: Introduce a list of ids for "always present" devices

2017-02-27 Thread Takashi Iwai
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 22:27:58 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:25:32 +0100, > > Hans de Goede wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 27-02-17 14:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> > +Mika & Andy > >> > > >> > On Saturday,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI / bus: Introduce a list of ids for "always present" devices

2017-02-27 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:58 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > > On 27-02-17 22:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:29 PM, Hans de Goede >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> On 27-02-17 22:25, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Hans d

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI / bus: Introduce a list of ids for "always present" devices

2017-02-27 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 27-02-17 22:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:29 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 27-02-17 22:25, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 27-02-17 14:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: +Mika & Andy On Saturday, Fe

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI / bus: Introduce a list of ids for "always present" devices

2017-02-27 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:29 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > > On 27-02-17 22:25, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Hans de Goede >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> On 27-02-17 14:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: +Mika & Andy On Saturday, Febr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI / bus: Introduce a list of ids for "always present" devices

2017-02-27 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 27-02-17 22:25, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 27-02-17 14:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: +Mika & Andy On Saturday, February 25, 2017 07:23:28 PM Hans de Goede wrote: Several cherrytrail devices (all of which ship with windows

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI / bus: Introduce a list of ids for "always present" devices

2017-02-27 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:25:32 +0100, > Hans de Goede wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 27-02-17 14:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> > +Mika & Andy >> > >> > On Saturday, February 25, 2017 07:23:28 PM Hans de Goede wrote: >> >> Several cherrytrail device

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI / bus: Introduce a list of ids for "always present" devices

2017-02-27 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > > On 27-02-17 14:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> +Mika & Andy >> >> On Saturday, February 25, 2017 07:23:28 PM Hans de Goede wrote: >>> >>> Several cherrytrail devices (all of which ship with windows 10) hide the >>> lpss pwm contr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI / bus: Introduce a list of ids for "always present" devices

2017-02-27 Thread Takashi Iwai
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:25:32 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi, > > On 27-02-17 14:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > +Mika & Andy > > > > On Saturday, February 25, 2017 07:23:28 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > >> Several cherrytrail devices (all of which ship with windows 10) hide the > >> lpss pwm con

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI / bus: Introduce a list of ids for "always present" devices

2017-02-27 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 27-02-17 14:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: +Mika & Andy On Saturday, February 25, 2017 07:23:28 PM Hans de Goede wrote: Several cherrytrail devices (all of which ship with windows 10) hide the lpss pwm controller in ACPI, typically the _STA method looks like this: Method (_STA, 0, No

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI / bus: Introduce a list of ids for "always present" devices

2017-02-27 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
+Mika & Andy On Saturday, February 25, 2017 07:23:28 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > Several cherrytrail devices (all of which ship with windows 10) hide the > lpss pwm controller in ACPI, typically the _STA method looks like this: > > Method (_STA, 0, NotSerialized) // _STA: Status > { >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI / bus: Introduce a list of ids for "always present" devices

2017-02-25 Thread Hans de Goede
Several cherrytrail devices (all of which ship with windows 10) hide the lpss pwm controller in ACPI, typically the _STA method looks like this: Method (_STA, 0, NotSerialized) // _STA: Status { If (OSID == One) { Return (Zero) } Return (0x0F)