Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/psr: Make idle_frames sensible again"

2016-09-13 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 08 Sep 2016, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 08 Sep 2016, Ville Syrjälä wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 05:42:31PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: >>> This reverts commit 1c80c25fb622973dd135878e98d172be20859049. >>> >>> There are panels

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/psr: Make idle_frames sensible again"

2016-09-08 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 08 Sep 2016, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 05:42:31PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: >> This reverts commit 1c80c25fb622973dd135878e98d172be20859049. >> >> There are panels that needs 4 idle frames before entering PSR, >> but VBT is unproperly

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/psr: Make idle_frames sensible again"

2016-09-08 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 05:42:31PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > This reverts commit 1c80c25fb622973dd135878e98d172be20859049. > > There are panels that needs 4 idle frames before entering PSR, > but VBT is unproperly set. > > Also lately it was identified that idle frame count calculated at HW >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/psr: Make idle_frames sensible again"

2016-09-07 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
This reverts commit 1c80c25fb622973dd135878e98d172be20859049. There are panels that needs 4 idle frames before entering PSR, but VBT is unproperly set. Also lately it was identified that idle frame count calculated at HW can be off by 1, what makes the minimum of 2, at least. Without the