[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dim: Update docs

2017-01-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
- Remove branch overview, instead link to drm-intel and drm-misc pages. - Move quickstart to the top, to make it easier to find. - Make quickstart generic, we use dim for other stuff than drm-intel now. - s/drm-intel-rerere/drm-rerere/ - Remove the section about resolving conflicts, that's

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dim: Update docs for update-branches

2016-12-12 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:14:29AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Fri, 09 Dec 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:53:07PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> >> On Thu, 08 Dec 2016, Daniel Vetter

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dim: Update docs for update-branches

2016-12-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:14:29AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Fri, 09 Dec 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:53:07PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> On Thu, 08 Dec 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> > It's been years since drm-intel

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dim: Update docs for update-branches

2016-12-12 Thread Jani Nikula
On Fri, 09 Dec 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:53:07PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Thu, 08 Dec 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > It's been years since drm-intel had only one maintainer, and the >> > primary use-case for dim ub

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dim: Update docs for update-branches

2016-12-09 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:53:07PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 08 Dec 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > It's been years since drm-intel had only one maintainer, and the > > primary use-case for dim ub was only to sync between machines. Update > > the docs to reflect

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dim: Update docs for update-branches

2016-12-08 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 08 Dec 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: > It's been years since drm-intel had only one maintainer, and the > primary use-case for dim ub was only to sync between machines. Update > the docs to reflect this, to avoid misleading committers. Also update > the

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dim: Update docs for update-branches

2016-12-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
It's been years since drm-intel had only one maintainer, and the primary use-case for dim ub was only to sync between machines. Update the docs to reflect this, to avoid misleading committers. Also update the maintainer-tools branch, which is something Paulo's script also does. Motivated because