Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/atomic: Always allow async support for the atomic ioctl.

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 25-04-16 om 11:35 schreef Daniel Vetter: >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Maarten Lankhorst >> wrote: >>> async_page_flip is a unrelated flag and should not

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/atomic: Always allow async support for the atomic ioctl.

Op 25-04-16 om 11:35 schreef Daniel Vetter: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Maarten Lankhorst > wrote: >> async_page_flip is a unrelated flag and should not be used for >> testing support. It's up to the drivers to fail if they don't >> support async commit.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/atomic: Always allow async support for the atomic ioctl.

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > async_page_flip is a unrelated flag and should not be used for > testing support. It's up to the drivers to fail if they don't > support async commit. > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/atomic: Always allow async support for the atomic ioctl.

async_page_flip is a unrelated flag and should not be used for testing support. It's up to the drivers to fail if they don't support async commit. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 4 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff