On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 17:27 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On some Cannonlake SKUs we have a dedicated Aux for port F,
> that is only the full split between port A and port E.
>
> There is still no Aux E for Port E, as in previous platforms,
> because port_E still means shared lanes with port A.
On some Cannonlake SKUs we have a dedicated Aux for port F,
that is only the full split between port A and port E.
There is still no Aux E for Port E, as in previous platforms,
because port_E still means shared lanes with port A.
v2: Rebase.
v3: Add couple missed PORT_F cases on intel_dp.
v4:
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:27:41PM +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 09:15 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On some Cannonlake SKUs we have a dedicated Aux for port F,
> > that is only the full split between port A and port E.
> >
> > There is still no Aux E for Port E,
On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 09:15 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On some Cannonlake SKUs we have a dedicated Aux for port F,
> that is only the full split between port A and port E.
>
> There is still no Aux E for Port E, as in previous platforms,
> because port_E still means shared lanes with port A.
>
On some Cannonlake SKUs we have a dedicated Aux for port F,
that is only the full split between port A and port E.
There is still no Aux E for Port E, as in previous platforms,
because port_E still means shared lanes with port A.
v2: Rebase.
v3: Add couple missed PORT_F cases on intel_dp.
v4:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 02:43:22AM +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 15:59 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On some Cannonlake SKUs we have a dedicated Aux for port F,
> > that is only the full split between port A and port E.
> >
> > There is still no Aux E for
an, Arthur J <arthur.j.run...@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cnl: Add AUX-F support
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 04:53:55AM +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 02:43 +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 201
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 04:53:55AM +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 02:43 +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 15:59 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > On some Cannonlake SKUs we have a dedicated Aux for port F,
> > > that is only the
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 02:53:55AM -0200, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 02:43 +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 15:59 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > On some Cannonlake SKUs we have a dedicated Aux for port F,
> > > that is only the
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 02:43 +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 15:59 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On some Cannonlake SKUs we have a dedicated Aux for port F,
> > that is only the full split between port A and port E.
> >
> > There is still no Aux E for Port E, as
On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 15:59 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On some Cannonlake SKUs we have a dedicated Aux for port F,
> that is only the full split between port A and port E.
>
> There is still no Aux E for Port E, as in previous platforms,
> because port_E still means shared lanes with port A.
On some Cannonlake SKUs we have a dedicated Aux for port F,
that is only the full split between port A and port E.
There is still no Aux E for Port E, as in previous platforms,
because port_E still means shared lanes with port A.
v2: Rebase.
v3: Add couple missed PORT_F cases on intel_dp.
v4:
12 matches
Mail list logo