Hi Rodrigo,
On 1/24/2023 8:26 PM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:07:19PM +0100, Das, Nirmoy wrote:
Forgot to add the drm issue a reference.
On 1/24/2023 12:05 PM, Nirmoy Das wrote:
From: Chris Wilson
Currently we use set-wedged on suspend if the workload is not responding
in
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:07:19PM +0100, Das, Nirmoy wrote:
> Forgot to add the drm issue a reference.
>
> On 1/24/2023 12:05 PM, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> > From: Chris Wilson
> >
> > Currently we use set-wedged on suspend if the workload is not responding
> > in order to allow a fast suspend (albei
Forgot to add the drm issue a reference.
On 1/24/2023 12:05 PM, Nirmoy Das wrote:
From: Chris Wilson
Currently we use set-wedged on suspend if the workload is not responding
in order to allow a fast suspend (albeit at the cost of discarding the
current userspace). This may leave the device wed
From: Chris Wilson
Currently we use set-wedged on suspend if the workload is not responding
in order to allow a fast suspend (albeit at the cost of discarding the
current userspace). This may leave the device wedged during suspend,
where we may require the device available in order to swapout CPU
