On 7/21/2023 3:08 PM, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
On 7/21/2023 2:23 PM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 01:44:34PM -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
On 7/21/2023 1:41 PM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 11:03:49AM -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
This should be done before
On 7/21/2023 2:23 PM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 01:44:34PM -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
On 7/21/2023 1:41 PM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 11:03:49AM -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
This should be done before the soft min/max frequencies are restored.
When
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 01:44:34PM -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
>
> On 7/21/2023 1:41 PM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 11:03:49AM -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
> > > This should be done before the soft min/max frequencies are restored.
> > > When we disable the "Ignore effic
On 7/21/2023 1:41 PM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 11:03:49AM -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
This should be done before the soft min/max frequencies are restored.
When we disable the "Ignore efficient frequency" flag, GuC does not
actually bring the requested freq down to RPn.
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 11:03:49AM -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
> This should be done before the soft min/max frequencies are restored.
> When we disable the "Ignore efficient frequency" flag, GuC does not
> actually bring the requested freq down to RPn.
>
> Specifically, this scenario-
>
> - i
This should be done before the soft min/max frequencies are restored.
When we disable the "Ignore efficient frequency" flag, GuC does not
actually bring the requested freq down to RPn.
Specifically, this scenario-
- ignore efficient freq set to true
- reduce min to RPn (from efficient)
- suspend
