Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Unify naming of private GuC action functions

2018-03-15 Thread Michał Winiarski
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 05:19:27PM +0100, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: > On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 16:57:26 +0100, Michał Winiarski > wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 06:37:15PM +, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: > > > We should avoid using guc_log prefix for functions that

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Unify naming of private GuC action functions

2018-03-15 Thread Michal Wajdeczko
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 16:57:26 +0100, Michał Winiarski wrote: On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 06:37:15PM +, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: We should avoid using guc_log prefix for functions that don't operate on GuC log, but rather request action from the GuC. Better to use

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Unify naming of private GuC action functions

2018-03-15 Thread Michał Winiarski
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 06:37:15PM +, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: > We should avoid using guc_log prefix for functions that don't > operate on GuC log, but rather request action from the GuC. > Better to use guc_action prefix. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko > Cc:

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Unify naming of private GuC action functions

2018-03-14 Thread Michal Wajdeczko
We should avoid using guc_log prefix for functions that don't operate on GuC log, but rather request action from the GuC. Better to use guc_action prefix. Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko Cc: Michal Winiarski Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble