Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/huc: Check HuC status in dedicated function

2018-03-21 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Michel Thierry (2018-03-14 23:34:33) > On 14/03/18 15:23, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 21:17:29 +0100, Michel Thierry > > wrote: > > > >> On 14/03/18 13:04, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: > >>> We try to keep all HuC related code in dedicated file.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/huc: Check HuC status in dedicated function

2018-03-14 Thread Michel Thierry
On 14/03/18 15:23, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 21:17:29 +0100, Michel Thierry wrote: On 14/03/18 13:04, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: We try to keep all HuC related code in dedicated file. There is no need to peek HuC register directly during handling

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/huc: Check HuC status in dedicated function

2018-03-14 Thread Michal Wajdeczko
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 21:17:29 +0100, Michel Thierry wrote: On 14/03/18 13:04, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: We try to keep all HuC related code in dedicated file. There is no need to peek HuC register directly during handling getparam ioctl. Signed-off-by: Michal

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/huc: Check HuC status in dedicated function

2018-03-14 Thread Michel Thierry
On 14/03/18 13:04, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: We try to keep all HuC related code in dedicated file. There is no need to peek HuC register directly during handling getparam ioctl. Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko Cc: Michel Thierry Cc: Rodrigo

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/huc: Check HuC status in dedicated function

2018-03-14 Thread Michal Wajdeczko
We try to keep all HuC related code in dedicated file. There is no need to peek HuC register directly during handling getparam ioctl. Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko Cc: Michel Thierry Cc: Rodrigo Vivi Cc: Anusha