On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:17:34AM +0530, Jindal, Sonika wrote:
On 6/23/2015 4:42 PM, David Weinehall wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 05:05:21PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:50:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
@@ -3520,6 +3545,9 @@
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:10:13AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
These are static routing, but called fairly often. (Often enough that
you care to only read the register once.) Any reason not to preserve
these routing tables in dev_priv or, slightly more preferrable, intel_dp?
Looking over this a
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:12:41PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 05:05:21PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:50:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
@@ -3520,6 +3545,9 @@ intel_dp_set_signal_levels(struct intel_dp
*intel_dp, uint32_t *DP)
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 05:05:21PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:50:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
@@ -3520,6 +3545,9 @@ intel_dp_set_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
uint32_t *DP)
} else if (HAS_DDI(dev)) {
signal_levels =
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:59:34AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 01:47:30PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:10:13AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:50:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
+static const struct ddi_buf_trans
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 05:05:21PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:50:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
@@ -3520,6 +3545,9 @@ intel_dp_set_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
uint32_t *DP)
} else if (HAS_DDI(dev)) {
signal_levels =
On 6/23/2015 4:42 PM, David Weinehall wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 05:05:21PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:50:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
@@ -3520,6 +3545,9 @@ intel_dp_set_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
uint32_t *DP)
} else if
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:50:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
@@ -3520,6 +3545,9 @@ intel_dp_set_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
uint32_t *DP)
} else if (HAS_DDI(dev)) {
signal_levels = hsw_signal_levels(train_set);
mask = DDI_BUF_EMP_MASK;
+
+
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:50:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
+static const struct ddi_buf_trans *skl_get_buf_trans_dp(struct drm_device
*dev,
struct drm_i915_private not struct drm_device!
+ int *n_entries)
+{
+ struct
This patch adds support for 0.85V VccIO on Skylake Y,
separate buffer translation tables for Skylake U,
and support for I_boost for the entries that needs this.
Issue: VIZ-5677
Signed-off-by: David Weinehall david.weineh...@linux.intel.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 8 +
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:10:13AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:50:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
+static const struct ddi_buf_trans *skl_get_buf_trans_dp(struct drm_device
*dev,
struct drm_i915_private not struct drm_device!
The device uses both dev and
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 01:47:30PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:10:13AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:50:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
+static const struct ddi_buf_trans *skl_get_buf_trans_dp(struct
drm_device *dev,
struct
12 matches
Mail list logo