Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Avoid null dereference if mst_port is unset.

2017-08-10 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2017-08-10 15:50:43) >> I'm not sure if this is really the case and I don't believe >> this is the real fix for the bug mentioned here, but since >> I don't see a reliable path when mst_port is

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Avoid null dereference if mst_port is unset.

2017-08-10 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 19:45 +0200, Stefan Assmann wrote: > On 2017-08-10 07:50, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > I'm not sure if this is really the case and I don't believe > > this is the real fix for the bug mentioned here, but since > > I don't see a reliable path when mst_port is set and when > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Avoid null dereference if mst_port is unset.

2017-08-10 Thread Stefan Assmann
On 2017-08-10 07:50, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > I'm not sure if this is really the case and I don't believe > this is the real fix for the bug mentioned here, but since > I don't see a reliable path when mst_port is set and when > mode_valid is requested I believe it is worth to have this > protection

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Avoid null dereference if mst_port is unset.

2017-08-10 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2017-08-10 15:50:43) > I'm not sure if this is really the case and I don't believe > this is the real fix for the bug mentioned here, but since > I don't see a reliable path when mst_port is set and when > mode_valid is requested I believe it is worth to have this >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Avoid null dereference if mst_port is unset.

2017-08-10 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
I'm not sure if this is really the case and I don't believe this is the real fix for the bug mentioned here, but since I don't see a reliable path when mst_port is set and when mode_valid is requested I believe it is worth to have this protection here. Bugzilla: