On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net wrote:
Apparently massive overclocking like that makes your system die
prematurely in a crash. So 3.10 it is, imo.
-Daniel
It's like all overclocking I guess, we simply give the user an
opportunity to shoot themselves in the
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 08:19:56PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
Change the gen6+ max delay if the pcode read was successful (not the
inverse).
The previous code was all sorts of wrong and has existed since I broke
it:
commit 42c0526c930523425ff6edc95b7235ce7ab9308d
Author: Ben Widawsky
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 08:32:53PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 08:19:56PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
Change the gen6+ max delay if the pcode read was successful (not the
inverse).
The previous code was all sorts of wrong and has existed since I broke
it:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 08:39:30PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 08:32:53PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 08:19:56PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
Change the gen6+ max delay if the pcode read was successful (not the
inverse).
The previous
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 08:19:56PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
Change the gen6+ max delay if the pcode read was successful (not the
inverse).
The previous code was all sorts of wrong and has existed since I broke
it:
commit 42c0526c930523425ff6edc95b7235ce7ab9308d
Author: Ben Widawsky
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:19:56 -0700
Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net wrote:
Change the gen6+ max delay if the pcode read was successful (not the
inverse).
The previous code was all sorts of wrong and has existed since I broke
it:
commit 42c0526c930523425ff6edc95b7235ce7ab9308d
Author: Ben
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 09:21:47AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:19:56 -0700
Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net wrote:
Change the gen6+ max delay if the pcode read was successful (not the
inverse).
The previous code was all sorts of wrong and has existed since I broke
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:33:28 -0700
Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 09:21:47AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:19:56 -0700
Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net wrote:
Change the gen6+ max delay if the pcode read was successful (not the
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 09:57:53AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:33:28 -0700
Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 09:21:47AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:19:56 -0700
Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net wrote:
Change
Change the gen6+ max delay if the pcode read was successful (not the
inverse).
The previous code was all sorts of wrong and has existed since I broke
it:
commit 42c0526c930523425ff6edc95b7235ce7ab9308d
Author: Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net
Date: Wed Sep 26 10:34:00 2012 -0700
drm/i915:
10 matches
Mail list logo