Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't set fence errors on non-guilty requests

2017-07-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
Oops, sent out the wrong patch, pls disregard. -Daniel On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > ... at least not in that place, because this can also fire for > requests which have completed. Which then hits the assert in > dma_fence_set_error. > > Since

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't set fence errors on non-guilty requests

2017-07-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
... at least not in that place, because this can also fire for requests which have completed. Which then hits the assert in dma_fence_set_error. Since I'm not really clear what should be done here I pinged Chris, and he suggested we simply remove this for now. Found while stress-testing gpu

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't set fence errors on non-guilty requests

2017-07-20 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Daniel Vetter (2017-07-20 18:59:01) > ... at least not in that place, because this can also fire for > requests which have completed. Which then hits the assert in > dma_fence_set_error. > > Since I'm not really clear what should be done here I pinged Chris, > and he suggested we simply

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't set fence errors on non-guilty requests

2017-07-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
... at least not in that place, because this can also fire for requests which have completed. Which then hits the assert in dma_fence_set_error. Since I'm not really clear what should be done here I pinged Chris, and he suggested we simply remove this for now. Found while stress-testing gpu