On Thu, 2023-06-29 at 15:25 +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> Currently we just clamp that value to the highest supported one, however that
> means, we are not able to fit this into our available bandwidth range, so we
> might see glitches or FIFO underruns.
> While choosing less compressed bpp
Currently we just clamp that value to the highest supported one, however that
means, we are not able to fit this into our available bandwidth range, so we
might see glitches or FIFO underruns.
While choosing less compressed bpp than min bpp required to handle the mode is
harmless and might even
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 03:18:52PM +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-06-26 at 11:28 +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> > Currently we just clamp that value to the highest supported one, however
> > that
> > means, we are not able to fit this into our available bandwidth range, so we
> >
On Mon, 2023-06-26 at 11:28 +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> Currently we just clamp that value to the highest supported one, however that
> means, we are not able to fit this into our available bandwidth range, so we
> might see glitches or FIFO underruns.
> While choosing less compressed bpp
Currently we just clamp that value to the highest supported one, however that
means, we are not able to fit this into our available bandwidth range, so we
might see glitches or FIFO underruns.
While choosing less compressed bpp than min bpp required to handle the mode is
harmless and might even
