Hi Stan,
I discussed with Ville a little bit on IRC and wanted to reflect some
conversation here as review so that it could be accommodated in your
next revision for bigjoiner changes.
For bigjoiner cases to work correctly, when bigjoiner steals a CRTC
for using it as slave CRTC, the assumption
Hi Stan, Ville,
After Stan's refactor series for bigjoiner, along with Vidya's patch
that assigns master/slave for MST as well, do you anticipate more MST
specific
bigjoiner modeset sequence changes to properly call crtc enable
sequence for MST master slave?
Stan, when you send the next revision
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 01:43:46PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 01:00:00AM +0530, vsrini4 wrote:
> > Patch calculates bigjoiner pipes in mst compute.
> > Patch also passes bigjoiner bool to validate plane
> > max size.
>
> I doubt this is sufficient. The modeset sequence
> -Original Message-
> From: Ville Syrjälä
> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2023 4:14 PM
> To: Srinivas, Vidya
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix bigjoiner case for DP2.0
>
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 01:00:0
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 01:00:00AM +0530, vsrini4 wrote:
> Patch calculates bigjoiner pipes in mst compute.
> Patch also passes bigjoiner bool to validate plane
> max size.
I doubt this is sufficient. The modeset sequence is still all
wrong for bigjoiner+mst.
>
> Signed-off-by: vsrini4
> ---
>
Patch calculates bigjoiner pipes in mst compute.
Patch also passes bigjoiner bool to validate plane
max size.
Signed-off-by: vsrini4
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 19 ---
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git
