On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:22:51AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Aug 2014, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> > I keep telling myself that those tables aren't great because their size
> > is the number of dwords we need to program and not the number of entries
> > (number of dwords = number of entri
On Sat, 09 Aug 2014, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> I keep telling myself that those tables aren't great because their size
> is the number of dwords we need to program and not the number of entries
> (number of dwords = number of entries * 2).
>
> And... I got it wrong when I refactored the code. Fortun
I keep telling myself that those tables aren't great because their size
is the number of dwords we need to program and not the number of entries
(number of dwords = number of entries * 2).
And... I got it wrong when I refactored the code. Fortunately, it was
only wrong when the VBT table (or the c
