On 11/17/11 9:13 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:45:40 -0500, Adam Jacksona...@redhat.com wrote:
Your silicon people worry me.
In any case, the changes are mostly to move bits around so that there
are two bits for pipe select
Yeah, the patch looks like it could be correct,
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 16:29 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
The Ivybridge eDP control register looks like a cross between a
Cougarpoint PCH DP control register and a Sandybridge eDP control
register.
Your silicon people worry me.
+/* IVB */
+#define EDP_LINK_TRAIN_400MV_0DB_IVB (0x24
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:45:40 -0500, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
Your silicon people worry me.
In any case, the changes are mostly to move bits around so that there
are two bits for pipe select
I don't even. Unless you're looking at some other version of the DP
spec than me, I was
The Ivybridge eDP control register looks like a cross between a
Cougarpoint PCH DP control register and a Sandybridge eDP control
register.
Where things trivially match, share the code. Where there are any
tricky bits, just split things out into two obviously separate code paths.
Signed-off-by: