Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: No busy-loop wait_for in the ring init code

On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 03:15:32PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 04:07:59PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: Doing a 1s wait (tops) with the cpu is a bit excessive. Tune it down like everything else in that code. Cc: Naresh Kumar Kachhi naresh.kumar.kac...@intel.com Cc:

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: No busy-loop wait_for in the ring init code

Doing a 1s wait (tops) with the cpu is a bit excessive. Tune it down like everything else in that code. Cc: Naresh Kumar Kachhi naresh.kumar.kac...@intel.com Cc: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: No busy-loop wait_for in the ring init code

On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 04:07:59PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: Doing a 1s wait (tops) with the cpu is a bit excessive. Tune it down like everything else in that code. 1s? Didn't wait_for_atomic() take a timeout in microseconds? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre