On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 07:50:31PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
2013/7/12 Paulo Zanoni przan...@gmail.com:
2013/7/12 Stéphane Marchesin marc...@chromium.org:
Otherwise the DDI_A_4_LANES bit gets lost and we can't use 2 lanes
on eDP. This fixes eDP on hsw with 2 lanes.
Also
Otherwise the DDI_A_4_LANES bit gets lost and we can't use 2 lanes
on eDP. This fixes eDP on hsw with 2 lanes.
Signed-off-by: Stéphane Marchesin marc...@chromium.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:03:46 -0700
Stéphane Marchesin marc...@chromium.org wrote:
Otherwise the DDI_A_4_LANES bit gets lost and we can't use 2 lanes
on eDP. This fixes eDP on hsw with 2 lanes.
Signed-off-by: Stéphane Marchesin marc...@chromium.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c |
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Stéphane Marchesin
marc...@chromium.org wrote:
Otherwise the DDI_A_4_LANES bit gets lost and we can't use 2 lanes
on eDP. This fixes eDP on hsw with 2 lanes.
Signed-off-by: Stéphane Marchesin marc...@chromium.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 2
Otherwise the DDI_A_4_LANES bit gets lost and we can't use 2 lanes
on eDP. This fixes eDP on hsw with 2 lanes.
Also s/port_reversal/saved_port_bits/ since the current name is
confusing.
Signed-off-by: Stéphane Marchesin marc...@chromium.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 10 ++
2013/7/12 Stéphane Marchesin marc...@chromium.org:
Otherwise the DDI_A_4_LANES bit gets lost and we can't use 2 lanes
on eDP. This fixes eDP on hsw with 2 lanes.
Also s/port_reversal/saved_port_bits/ since the current name is
confusing.
Signed-off-by: Stéphane Marchesin
2013/7/12 Paulo Zanoni przan...@gmail.com:
2013/7/12 Stéphane Marchesin marc...@chromium.org:
Otherwise the DDI_A_4_LANES bit gets lost and we can't use 2 lanes
on eDP. This fixes eDP on hsw with 2 lanes.
Also s/port_reversal/saved_port_bits/ since the current name is
confusing.