Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Re-enable per-engine reset for Broxton

2017-09-06 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Michel Thierry (2017-09-06 16:25:06) > On 05/09/17 06:57, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-08-21 15:55:34) > >> Quoting Michel Thierry (2017-08-18 18:23:42) > >>> The corruption in CSB mmio reads we were seeing has been tracked down to > >>> incorrectly touching forcewake

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Re-enable per-engine reset for Broxton

2017-09-06 Thread Michel Thierry
On 05/09/17 06:57, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-08-21 15:55:34) Quoting Michel Thierry (2017-08-18 18:23:42) The corruption in CSB mmio reads we were seeing has been tracked down to incorrectly touching forcewake of all domains, following an engine reset. It is still a

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Re-enable per-engine reset for Broxton

2017-09-05 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-08-21 15:55:34) > Quoting Michel Thierry (2017-08-18 18:23:42) > > The corruption in CSB mmio reads we were seeing has been tracked down to > > incorrectly touching forcewake of all domains, following an engine reset. > > It is still a mistery why we only catched this in

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Re-enable per-engine reset for Broxton

2017-08-21 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Michel Thierry (2017-08-18 18:23:42) > The corruption in CSB mmio reads we were seeing has been tracked down to > incorrectly touching forcewake of all domains, following an engine reset. > It is still a mistery why we only catched this in Broxton, since it > could happen in any platform.

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Re-enable per-engine reset for Broxton

2017-08-18 Thread Michel Thierry
The corruption in CSB mmio reads we were seeing has been tracked down to incorrectly touching forcewake of all domains, following an engine reset. It is still a mistery why we only catched this in Broxton, since it could happen in any platform. With that fix already merged, commit 4055dc75d6b5