On Wed, 2023-09-13 at 18:01 +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 03:02:58PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Sep 2023, Jouni Högander
> > wrote:
> > > It's not necessary to carry separate suspended status information
> > > in
> > > intel_runtime_pm struct as this information
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 03:02:58PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023, Jouni Högander wrote:
> > It's not necessary to carry separate suspended status information in
> > intel_runtime_pm struct as this information is already in underlying device
> > structure. Remove it and use
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023, Jouni Högander wrote:
> It's not necessary to carry separate suspended status information in
> intel_runtime_pm struct as this information is already in underlying device
> structure. Remove it and use pm_runtime_suspended() to obtain suspended
> status information when
It's not necessary to carry separate suspended status information in
intel_runtime_pm struct as this information is already in underlying device
structure. Remove it and use pm_runtime_suspended() to obtain suspended
status information when needed.
Cc: Jani Nikula
Cc: Imre Deak
Signed-off-by:
