Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use atomic page flip for intel again.

2017-01-23 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 27-12-16 om 15:48 schreef Daniel Vetter: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:33:23AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> This reverts commit 527b6abe5fd2d2 >> (Revert "drm/i915: Use atomic commits for legacy page_flips") >> >> and reapplies commit ee042aa40b66d1. >> ("drm/i915: Use atomic commits for

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use atomic page flip for intel again.

2016-12-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:33:23AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > This reverts commit 527b6abe5fd2d2 > (Revert "drm/i915: Use atomic commits for legacy page_flips") > > and reapplies commit ee042aa40b66d1. > ("drm/i915: Use atomic commits for legacy page_flips") > > The reason for the revert

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use atomic page flip for intel again.

2016-12-22 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
This reverts commit 527b6abe5fd2d2 (Revert "drm/i915: Use atomic commits for legacy page_flips") and reapplies commit ee042aa40b66d1. ("drm/i915: Use atomic commits for legacy page_flips") The reason for the revert was because legacy cursor updates were forced to wait for pending page flips and