On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 01:45:01PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2015-08-17 13:30 GMT-03:00 Dave Gordon :
> > The current versions of these two macros don't work correctly if the
> > argument expression happens to contain a modulo operator (%) -- when
> > stringified, it gets interpreted as a printf
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 7223
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
ILK -2
2015-08-17 13:30 GMT-03:00 Dave Gordon :
> The current versions of these two macros don't work correctly if the
> argument expression happens to contain a modulo operator (%) -- when
> stringified, it gets interpreted as a printf formatting character!
> With a specifically crafted parameter, this c
The current versions of these two macros don't work correctly if the
argument expression happens to contain a modulo operator (%) -- when
stringified, it gets interpreted as a printf formatting character!
With a specifically crafted parameter, this could probably cause a
kernel OOPS; consider WARN_
