On 2012-09-09 02:50, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Ben Widawsky
wrote:
On 2012-09-06 06:43, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Otherwise the new&shiny irq-driven gmbus and dp aux code won't work
that
well. Noticed since the dp aux code doesn't have an automatic
fallback
with a tim
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On 2012-09-06 06:43, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>
>> Otherwise the new&shiny irq-driven gmbus and dp aux code won't work that
>> well. Noticed since the dp aux code doesn't have an automatic fallback
>> with a timeout (since the hw provides for that
On 2012-09-06 06:43, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Otherwise the new&shiny irq-driven gmbus and dp aux code won't work
that
well. Noticed since the dp aux code doesn't have an automatic
fallback
with a timeout (since the hw provides for that already).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
---
drivers/gpu/drm/
Otherwise the new&shiny irq-driven gmbus and dp aux code won't work that
well. Noticed since the dp aux code doesn't have an automatic fallback
with a timeout (since the hw provides for that already).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 5 ++---
drivers/gpu/d
