From: Daniel Vetter
Two bits:
- check actual atomic state, the legacy stuff can only be looked at
from within the atomic_commit_tail function, since it's only
protected by ordering and not by any locks.
- Make sure we don't wreak the work an ongoing nonblocking
From: Daniel Vetter
Two bits:
- check actual atomic state, the legacy stuff can only be looked at
from within the atomic_commit_tail function, since it's only
protected by ordering and not by any locks.
- Make sure we don't wreak the work an ongoing nonblocking
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 10:09:32AM -0800, Manasi Navare wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 02:28:23PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:26:15PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 02:11:46PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 02:28:23PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:26:15PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 02:11:46PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:04:58PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:26:15PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 02:11:46PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:04:58PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 01:57:50PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > Two bits:
> > > > - check
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 02:11:46PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:04:58PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 01:57:50PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > Two bits:
> > > - check actual atomic state, the legacy stuff can only be looked at
> > > from
Op 08-11-17 om 14:04 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 01:57:50PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> Two bits:
>> - check actual atomic state, the legacy stuff can only be looked at
>> from within the atomic_commit_tail function, since it's only
>> protected by ordering and not by
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:04:58PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 01:57:50PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Two bits:
> > - check actual atomic state, the legacy stuff can only be looked at
> > from within the atomic_commit_tail function, since it's only
> > protected
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 01:57:50PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Two bits:
> - check actual atomic state, the legacy stuff can only be looked at
> from within the atomic_commit_tail function, since it's only
> protected by ordering and not by any locks.
>
> - Make sure we don't wreak the work
Two bits:
- check actual atomic state, the legacy stuff can only be looked at
from within the atomic_commit_tail function, since it's only
protected by ordering and not by any locks.
- Make sure we don't wreak the work an ongoing nonblocking commit is
doing.
v2: We need the crtc lock too,
10 matches
Mail list logo