On 04/15/2015 03:03 AM, Mario Kleiner wrote:
On 04/02/2015 01:34 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On vblank instant-off systems, we can get into a situation where the cost
of enabling and disabling the vblank IRQ around a drmWaitVblank query
dominates. However, we know that if the user wants the curren
On 04/02/2015 01:34 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On vblank instant-off systems, we can get into a situation where the cost
of enabling and disabling the vblank IRQ around a drmWaitVblank query
dominates. However, we know that if the user wants the current vblank
counter, they are also very likely to i
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 11:20:20AM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 02.04.2015 20:34, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On vblank instant-off systems, we can get into a situation where the cost
> > of enabling and disabling the vblank IRQ around a drmWaitVblank query
> > dominates. However, we know that if t
On 02.04.2015 20:34, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On vblank instant-off systems, we can get into a situation where the cost
> of enabling and disabling the vblank IRQ around a drmWaitVblank query
> dominates. However, we know that if the user wants the current vblank
> counter, they are also very likely t
Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 6120
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
PNV 272/272
On vblank instant-off systems, we can get into a situation where the cost
of enabling and disabling the vblank IRQ around a drmWaitVblank query
dominates. However, we know that if the user wants the current vblank
counter, they are also very likely to immediately queue a vblank wait
and so we can k
