Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Fix plane type uabi breakage

2016-09-23 Thread Sean Paul
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Fri, 23 Sep 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> Turns out assuming that only stuff in uabi is uabi is a bit naive, and >> we have a bunch of properties for which the enum values are placed in

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Fix plane type uabi breakage

2016-09-23 Thread Archit Taneja
On 09/23/2016 12:05 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: Turns out assuming that only stuff in uabi is uabi is a bit naive, and we have a bunch of properties for which the enum values are placed in random headers. A proper fix would be to split out uapi include headers, but meanwhile sprinkle at least

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Fix plane type uabi breakage

2016-09-23 Thread Jani Nikula
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Turns out assuming that only stuff in uabi is uabi is a bit naive, and > we have a bunch of properties for which the enum values are placed in > random headers. A proper fix would be to split out uapi include > headers, but

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Fix plane type uabi breakage

2016-09-23 Thread Daniel Vetter
Turns out assuming that only stuff in uabi is uabi is a bit naive, and we have a bunch of properties for which the enum values are placed in random headers. A proper fix would be to split out uapi include headers, but meanwhile sprinkle at least some warning over them. Fixes: 532b36712ddf