Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] lib/stackdepot: always do filter_irq_stacks() in stack_depot_save()

2021-12-01 Thread Andrey Konovalov
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 11:14 AM Marco Elver wrote: > > The non-interrupt portion of interrupt stack traces before interrupt > entry is usually arbitrary. Therefore, saving stack traces of interrupts > (that include entries before interrupt entry) to stack depot leads to > unbounded stackdepot

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] lib/stackdepot: always do filter_irq_stacks() in stack_depot_save()

2021-11-30 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 11/30/21 10:57, Marco Elver wrote: > The non-interrupt portion of interrupt stack traces before interrupt > entry is usually arbitrary. Therefore, saving stack traces of interrupts > (that include entries before interrupt entry) to stack depot leads to > unbounded stackdepot growth. > > As