Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gem_bad_address: Adapt test to ppgtt to pass with command parser

2015-05-18 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 03:47:25AM +, Popov, Pavel E wrote: Hi Chris, Thanks for quick response. I see that these tests from HANG section. Probably all tests with unclear behavior are put here. But what is about the test gem_exec_bad_domains? It also contains BAD_GTT_DEST with

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gem_bad_address: Adapt test to ppgtt to pass with command parser

2015-05-17 Thread Popov, Pavel E
Hi Chris, Thanks for quick response. I see that these tests from HANG section. Probably all tests with unclear behavior are put here. But what is about the test gem_exec_bad_domains? It also contains BAD_GTT_DEST with the same value. This test isn't from HANG section. Pavel -Original

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gem_bad_address: Adapt test to ppgtt to pass with command parser

2015-05-15 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 04:05:01PM +0600, Pavel Popov wrote: The gem_bad_address test started to fail on Gen7 with enabled command parser. Error message is printed because MI_GLOBAL_GTT equals to MI_MEM_VIRTUAL: CMD: Rejected command 0x1062 for bitmask 0x0040 MI_MEM_VIRTUAL

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gem_bad_address: Adapt test to ppgtt to pass with command parser

2015-05-15 Thread Pavel Popov
The gem_bad_address test started to fail on Gen7 with enabled command parser. Error message is printed because MI_GLOBAL_GTT equals to MI_MEM_VIRTUAL: CMD: Rejected command 0x1062 for bitmask 0x0040 MI_MEM_VIRTUAL means global gtt. This bit shouldn't be set for ppgtt. Changed test