From: Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com
Don't see that it causes a problem but it looks it was intended
to use bo_count at these places.
Also using count to determine number of processes does not make
sense unless thousands of cores.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 11:37:49AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com
Don't see that it causes a problem but it looks it was intended
to use bo_count at these places.
Also using count to determine number of processes does not make
sense unless
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 13:12 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 11:37:49AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com
Don't see that it causes a problem but it looks it was intended
to use bo_count at these places.
Also using count to
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 12:33:28PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 13:12 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 11:37:49AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com
Don't see that it causes a problem but it looks it was
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 14:46 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 12:33:28PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 13:12 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 11:37:49AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com