On 24/11/2021 18:07, Zbigniew Kempczyński wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 08:45:50AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 24/11/2021 08:04, Zbigniew Kempczyński wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:49:04AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 22/11/2021 19:13, Zbigniew Kempczyński wrote:
In short -
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 08:45:50AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 24/11/2021 08:04, Zbigniew Kempczyński wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:49:04AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > >
> > > On 22/11/2021 19:13, Zbigniew Kempczyński wrote:
> > > > In short - we want to enforce alignment ==
On 24/11/2021 08:04, Zbigniew Kempczyński wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:49:04AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 22/11/2021 19:13, Zbigniew Kempczyński wrote:
In short - we want to enforce alignment == 0 for gen4+ GEM object
settings.
Before we merge this we need to inspect all UMD we
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:49:04AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 22/11/2021 19:13, Zbigniew Kempczyński wrote:
> > In short - we want to enforce alignment == 0 for gen4+ GEM object
> > settings.
> >
> > Before we merge this we need to inspect all UMD we expect can use
> > this. My
On 22/11/2021 19:13, Zbigniew Kempczyński wrote:
In short - we want to enforce alignment == 0 for gen4+ GEM object
settings.
Before we merge this we need to inspect all UMD we expect can use
this. My investigation was narrowed to UMD code:
1. IGT
2. Mesa
3. Media-Driver
4. NEO
5. libdrm
6.
In short - we want to enforce alignment == 0 for gen4+ GEM object
settings.
Before we merge this we need to inspect all UMD we expect can use
this. My investigation was narrowed to UMD code:
1. IGT
2. Mesa
3. Media-Driver
4. NEO
5. libdrm
6. xf86-intel-video
I would like to ask subsystem
