Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] extend page_track for external usage

2016-11-09 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 09/11/2016 03:03, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > On 2016.11.07 10:17:54 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: Paolo, for this case, do you think it's feasible we pick them through drm/i915 merge path? As currently initial KVMGT patch sets require these exported symbols, that's why I ask how we shou

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] extend page_track for external usage

2016-11-08 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2016.11.07 10:17:54 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> Paolo, for this case, do you think it's feasible we pick them through > >> drm/i915 merge path? As currently initial KVMGT patch sets require these > >> exported symbols, that's why I ask how we should handle this dependency. > > > > Then it's

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] extend page_track for external usage

2016-11-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 04/11/2016 11:29, Zhenyu Wang wrote: >> On 2016.11.04 11:02:05 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 25/10/2016 09:50, Jike Song wrote: >> page_track is currently used only by KVM internally to protect guest >> page tables. To b