Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] Fixed16.16 wrapper cleanup & wm optimization

Op 17-08-17 om 17:16 schreef Mahesh Kumar: > Hi, > > My bad, I forgot to modify cover-letter before sending series to intel-gfx. > > yes this is for upstream consideration. Thanks, applied. I changed the enableddisabled in the debugfs patch to yesno, so if you want to write to it you can use yes

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] Fixed16.16 wrapper cleanup & wm optimization

Hi, My bad, I forgot to modify cover-letter before sending series to intel-gfx. yes this is for upstream consideration. -Mahesh On Thursday 17 August 2017 08:10 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: On Thu, 17 Aug 2017, Mahesh Kumar wrote: This is a Trybot Version of series.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] Fixed16.16 wrapper cleanup & wm optimization

On Thu, 17 Aug 2017, Mahesh Kumar wrote: > This is a Trybot Version of series. What do you mean? Is this for upstream consideration or not? BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center ___ Intel-gfx mailing

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] Fixed16.16 wrapper cleanup & wm optimization

This is a Trybot Version of series. This series Include patches for: clean fixed16.16 wrappers optimize wm calculation code enable/Implement trans wm calculation create a DebugFS entry for IPC status Kumar, Mahesh (8): drm/i915: Fixed point fixed16 wrapper

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] Fixed16.16 wrapper cleanup & wm optimization

This series Include patches for: clean fixed16.16 wrappers optimize wm calculation code enable/Implement trans wm calculation create a DebugFS entry for IPC status Mahesh Kumar (8): drm/i915: Fixed point fixed16 wrapper cleanup drm/i915/skl+: Optimize WM

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] Fixed16.16 wrapper cleanup & wm optimization

This series Include patches for: clean fixed16.16 naming & make them consistent optimize wm calculation code enable/Implement trans wm calculation Changes Since V1: - Split fixed16 cleanup code in more logical patches (Maarten) - make intel_compute_linetime_wm function