Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/etnaviv: Remove manual call to reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu before wait

Am Mittwoch, den 05.10.2016, 21:45 +0530 schrieb Sumit Semwal: > Hi Lucas, > > On 23 September 2016 at 18:25, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:08:25AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > >> Since fence_wait_timeout_reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu() with a > >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/etnaviv: Remove manual call to reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu before wait

Hi Lucas, On 23 September 2016 at 18:25, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:08:25AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: >> Since fence_wait_timeout_reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu() with a >> timeout of 0 becomes reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(), we do not >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/etnaviv: Remove manual call to reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu before wait

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:08:25AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Since fence_wait_timeout_reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu() with a > timeout of 0 becomes reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(), we do not > need to handle such conversion in the caller. The only challenge are > those callers that

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/etnaviv: Remove manual call to reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu before wait

Since fence_wait_timeout_reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu() with a timeout of 0 becomes reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(), we do not need to handle such conversion in the caller. The only challenge are those callers that wish to differentiate the error code between the nonblocking busy