On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:16:58PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:08:50 -0300
Paulo Zanoni przan...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-02-21 14:34 GMT-03:00 Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 13:52:20 -0300
Paulo Zanoni przan...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com
When we call gen6_gt_force_wake_put we don't actually put force_wake,
we just schedule gen6_force_wake_work through mod_delayed_work, and
that will eventually release force_wake.
The problem is that we call intel_runtime_pm_put directly at
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 13:52:20 -0300
Paulo Zanoni przan...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com
When we call gen6_gt_force_wake_put we don't actually put force_wake,
we just schedule gen6_force_wake_work through mod_delayed_work, and
that will eventually release
2014-02-21 14:34 GMT-03:00 Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 13:52:20 -0300
Paulo Zanoni przan...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com
When we call gen6_gt_force_wake_put we don't actually put force_wake,
we just schedule gen6_force_wake_work