On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 03:11:54PM -0700, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-04-02 at 11:20 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 03:23:31PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza
> > wrote:
> > > intel_psr_activate_block_get() should be called when by some reason
> > > PSR should not be
On Mon, 2018-04-02 at 11:20 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 03:23:31PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza
> wrote:
> > intel_psr_activate_block_get() should be called when by some reason
> > PSR should not be activated for some time, it will increment
> > counter
> > and it should
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 03:23:31PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> intel_psr_activate_block_get() should be called when by some reason
> PSR should not be activated for some time, it will increment counter
> and it should the decremented by intel_psr_activate_block_put()
> when PSR can be
intel_psr_activate_block_get() should be called when by some reason
PSR should not be activated for some time, it will increment counter
and it should the decremented by intel_psr_activate_block_put()
when PSR can be activated again.
intel_psr_activate_block_put() will not actually activate PSR,