Message-
From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel
Vetter
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 4:50 PM
To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
Cc: Daniel Vetter; Lespiau, Damien; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915:
s
: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915:
s/intel_ring_buffer/intel_engine
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:28:27PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 01:08:36PM +0100, oscar.ma...@intel.com
wrote:
From: Oscar Mateo oscar.ma...@intel.com
In the upcoming patches
; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915:
s/intel_ring_buffer/intel_engine
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 02:17:23PM +, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Lespiau, Damien
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 2:26 PM
: Lespiau, Damien; Daniel Vetter; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915:
s/intel_ring_buffer/intel_engine
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 02:17:23PM +, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Lespiau, Damien
Sent
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Mateo Lozano, Oscar
oscar.ma...@intel.com wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index 108e1ec2fa4b..e34db43dead3
100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1825,7
-Original Message-
From: daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of
Daniel Vetter
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 2:53 PM
To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
Cc: Lespiau, Damien; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915:
s
@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915:
s/intel_ring_buffer/intel_engine
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Mateo Lozano, Oscar
oscar.ma...@intel.com wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index 108e1ec2fa4b
, Damien; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915:
s/intel_ring_buffer/intel_engine
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Mateo Lozano, Oscar
oscar.ma...@intel.com wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 03:26:09PM +, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
I think special-casing the i915_gem_context_get function for the default
context and using private_default_ctx a bit more sounds good. We need to
adjust the idr allocator a bit though to reserve 0, and a bit of frobbing
Of Daniel Vetter
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 4:50 PM
To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
Cc: Daniel Vetter; Lespiau, Damien; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915:
s/intel_ring_buffer/intel_engine
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 03:26:09PM +, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:12:26AM -0700, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
BTW: do you want me to kill private_default_ctx as well? It doesn´t look very
useful...
Isn't private_default_ctx the one that's actually used when userspace
specifies DEFAULT_CONTEXT_ID?
Brad
-Original Message-
From: Volkin, Bradley D
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 5:24 PM
To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
Cc: Daniel Vetter; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915:
s/intel_ring_buffer/intel_engine
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:12:26AM -0700
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:33:37AM -0700, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Volkin, Bradley D
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 5:24 PM
To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
Cc: Daniel Vetter; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915:
s
-Original Message-
From: Volkin, Bradley D
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 5:41 PM
To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
Cc: Daniel Vetter; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915:
s/intel_ring_buffer/intel_engine
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:33:37AM -0700
: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915:
s/intel_ring_buffer/intel_engine
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:12:26AM -0700, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
BTW: do you want me to kill private_default_ctx as well? It
doesn´t look very
useful...
Isn't private_default_ctx the one that's
-Original Message-
From: Lespiau, Damien
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 2:26 PM
To: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Mateo Lozano, Oscar; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915:
s/intel_ring_buffer/intel_engine
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:28:27PM +0200
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 02:17:23PM +, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Lespiau, Damien
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 2:26 PM
To: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Mateo Lozano, Oscar; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915:
s
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:28:27PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 01:08:36PM +0100, oscar.ma...@intel.com wrote:
From: Oscar Mateo oscar.ma...@intel.com
In the upcoming patches, we plan to break the correlation between
engines (a.k.a. rings) and ringbuffers, so it
18 matches
Mail list logo
