Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915: Add per context timelines to fence object

2015-12-21 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 09:49:27AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > Yeah we definitely want this, but it'll have to be reconciled with the > different request->fence patches. I'm not sure if it would be easier to move > to per-context seqnos first or go this route and deal with the mismatch >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915: Add per context timelines to fence object

2015-12-17 Thread Jesse Barnes
On 12/11/2015 05:11 AM, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote: > From: John Harrison > > The fence object used inside the request structure requires a sequence > number. Although this is not used by the i915 driver itself, it could > potentially be used by non-i915 code if

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915: Add per context timelines to fence object

2015-12-11 Thread John . C . Harrison
From: John Harrison The fence object used inside the request structure requires a sequence number. Although this is not used by the i915 driver itself, it could potentially be used by non-i915 code if the fence is passed outside of the driver. This is the intention as